Cognitive Framing and Its Impact on Graphic Design and Future Challenges
Keywords:
Framing, Cognitive, Design, Graphic, Challenges, FutureAbstract
Contemporary reality is linked to a set of cognitive contradictions that contradict human thought and its original values, that reality produces exchanges that are difficult to face as future challenges to society and the State, and that prevent the realization of strategic structures in social construction, this lies in the strength of cognitive framing at the global, international and local levels, which necessitated identifying its cognitive contents and how to integrate with graphic design processes in its various dimensions to draw internal and external thought plans and the difficulty of synthesis between them to expose the design to outputs accessible to all individuals, that is, graphic design is not currently limited to the academic only, but it is available for everyone to deal with its tools to produce achievements that may compete with the academic designer cognitively.
References
I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes*, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.
R. M. Entman, “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm,” *Journal of Communication*, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51–58, 1993.
M. Foucault, *Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977*. New York, NY, USA: Pantheon Books, 1980.
W. A. Gamson and A. Modigliani, “The changing culture of affirmative action,” *Research in Political Sociology*, vol. 3, pp. 137–177, 1987.
S. Hall, *Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices*. London, U.K.: Sage Publications, 1997.
M. A. K. Halliday, *Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning*. London, U.K.: Edward Arnold, 1978.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” *Econometrica*, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292, 1979.
S. M. Kosslyn, *Elements of Graph Design*. New York, NY, USA: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1994.
A. Lang, “The limited capacity model of mediated message processing,” *Journal of Communication*, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 46–70, 2000.
L. Manovich, *The Language of New Media*. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2001.
P. Messaris, *Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising*. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 1997.
J. Steuer, “Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence,” *Journal of Communication*, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 73–93, 1992.
R. Williams, *The Animator’s Survival Kit*. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001.
E. Lupton, *Thinking with Type*. New York, NY, USA: Princeton Architectural Press, 2010, p. 45.
A. A. AlSayed, *Psychological Studies in Artistic Taste*. Beirut, Lebanon: Gharib Library for Printing and Publishing, 1989.
M. S.-S. Ibrahim, *Media Framing Techniques and Meaning Construction*. Egypt: Mina University, Dar Al-Ulum for Publishing and Distribution, 2020.
A. Regarder, *Umberto Eco: L’œuvre ouverte*. Paris, France: Seuil, 1965; *La structure absente*. Paris, France: Mercure de France, 1997.
H.-R. Yus, *The Aesthetics of Reception and Literary Communication*, trans. Asfour. Beirut, Lebanon: Contemporary Arab Thought, 2014, issue 38.
